Arica Redline attacks your AI agents the way attackers do — prompt injection, tool abuse, memory poisoning, data exfiltration — and hands you reproducible receipts: exact payloads, captured impact, framework-mapped findings, and a fix path your auditor can verify.
Enterprise security and agent adoption are running on different clocks. The platforms that monitor your cloud don't test what you built — and the questionnaire-desk needs proof, not posture.
of organizations run AI agents — but only 44% have any policy to secure them.
— SailPoint · Dimensional Research, 2025of enterprises build their agents in-house — meaning no vendor platform covers what they shipped.
— Team8 CISO Village 2025of midmarket teams say enterprise security platforms assume staff and budget they don't have.
— Intruder, Security Middle Child ReportA receipt is an artifact, not an assertion: the exact input that broke it, what the system did, and the framework it maps to — so your security team, your auditor, and your enterprise buyers read the same document and reach the same conclusion.
Copy-paste payloads — direct and indirect prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool-confusion, multi-turn exploits — logged exactly as sent.
Screenshots, HAR captures, tool-call traces and time-stamped output proving what the agent actually did under attack.
Every finding mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 2025, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS and NIST AI RMF — audit-ready by construction.
Prioritized remediation with effort estimates, then a re-test — and a CI regression pack so the fix can't silently regress.
The same engagement, written for the board, the auditor, and the enterprise buyer who asked the security question.
Honest limits, stated in writing. No inflated counts, no findings that don't reproduce, no theater.
SaaS self-serve platform (register agents → automated testing → portal receipts) ships later — Arica Redline. Founders and early teams can already book engagements.
You shipped agents to production and a deal just got blocked on an AI-security question you can't answer from memory. Get the evidence your enterprise buyer actually asked for.
Your team is small, your board is asking about AI governance, and the platforms you're pitched assume headcount you don't have. Get a specialist who tests what you actually built — in weeks, not quarters.
You answer 50-page vendor questionnaires. An independent, reproducible AI security report with receipts is a sales asset — it closes deals your team already won on paper.
We only test systems with written authorization. We never promise findings — we deliver a time-boxed adversarial assessment with receipts either way. If we find nothing exploitable, you get a documented, defensible negative result. That's still evidence.